Recent work, life, struggle...

Indonesian youth celebrate diversity with Peace Torch

Youth from different faiths, together lift the peace torch and wish for peace in Archipelago.
Photo: AFSC Staff

 

For 15 years, Protestant Church leaders in Kupang, West Timor, Indonesia have organized an Easter Parade the day after Easter Sunday.   The parade which includes floats, singing and dancing, has become both a local celebration and a tourist attraction.  Thanks to the energetic and creative organizing of young people, this year’s parade was unique.

 In response to religious violence and rising community tensions during the past year, youth of different religious backgrounds in West Timor initiated a Peace Torch feature, transforming the parade into an ecumenical celebration with prominent participation of minority religious groups in West Timor.

The idea for the Peace Torch arose from the AFSC sponsored Youth Pluralism workshop held in February in Yogyakarta.  The workshop brought together forty youth activists from all over Indonesia to share their experiences with pluralism and to discuss how they could facilitate youth activism around pluralism. Despite a long history of religious tolerance, Indonesia recently has been plagued by outbreaks of religious violence.  AFSC has been working with all groups to promote peaceful exchanges.


A group of sixteen interfaith youth played key roles in planning the Peace Torch event.  Before the parade, they participated in a radio talk show which highlighted the importance of peace between religions. The Peace Torch also was announced in Sunday services at all Protestant congregations in Kupang in the weeks preceding the Easter Parade.  On parade day, the torch lighting ceremony included the Mayor of Kupang and other civic and political leaders, and the recitation of the peace pledge.   Youth vowed not to be provoked into discriminatory actions and made a solemn commitment to prevent conflicts through nonviolent dialogue.
They then took their place at the head of the parade and  took turns bearing the Peace Torch through the streets of Kupang.  When they reached the Muslim village of Solor,  residents clapped their hands and spontaneously shouted,  “We love peace, we want peace.”

In media interviews, youth organizers stressed  that Kupang was only the first stop for the  Peace Torch.  At the end of May, the torch, again carried by a group of interfaith youth, made its  way to Menado, South Sulawesi, at the request of the governor for the national celebration of Pancasila, Indonesia’s national identity.  AFSC youth partners in Jogjakarta and in Aceh are also making plans for the Peace Torch to come to their area, and word of the Peace Torch is spreading to other parts of Indonesia. 

Now AFSC Indonesia is working closely with the interfaith youth leaders to formulate a nonviolence curriculum which draws on the wisdom and traditions of all Indonesia’s faith groups to protect and promote diversity and tolerance. This curriculum will be piloted in West Timor and then shared to other areas where the Peace Torch has traveled.

link

Race, Diversity and Buddhism: Thoughts and a Proposal

Although I have been an activist for a long time and during my college years helped lead a student protest movement for diversity, to this day I dread discussions about race, the feelings they bring up in myself and others, the conflict that arises, and the ultimate and inescapable dissatisfaction with the ways things end. But recently I've been stirred and inspired by Arun at Angry Asian Buddhist, and even more recently by posts and comments by Nathan at Dangerous Harvests, and Katie at Kloncke.

At the same time I am concerned by the generally unsatisfactory discussion about race and diversity on many Buddhist blogs. These discussions have been full of misunderstanding, misrepresentation, hurt feelings all around, blanket statements, and a general lack of compassion or insight. Its often as if we don't really hear what others are saying but are separately instead engaged in a discussion with ghosts from previous discussions with all the accumulated baggage. At times we shout past each other, selectively hearing and cherry picking what is said for more fuel to add to the fire. It is even more regrettable when these discussions involve Buddhists because there is just extra arrow added on top of extra arrow, increasing suffering and seemingly disdaining the skillful means we as Buddhists should be developing and practicing.

Why have or participate in these discussions then? For me personally at a certain level there really is no choice. From a very young age, standing up to racism or asserting myself in a forum with racial overtones was part of an existential struggle. I felt like if I didn't speak out, stand up and fight back, I would not exist as a person and any risk was worth taking to prevent that. Those times I was silent or didn't fight back, I would torture myself again and again remembering my failure, cowardice and humiliation and despising myself for my weakness.

With meditation I have started to realize that the cost of anger is a steep one - the loss of personal balance and objectifying the focus of my anger which in other words is dehumanization and doing to someone else the very thing I don't want to happen to me. That's not to say I still don't get angry but the intensity has lessened and its not as all consuming. There is the awareness on some sort of fundamental level that the anger is not me and I am more than just the anger. I can be somewhat objective and watch it as an observer.

Also there is the realization that not every battle has to be joined, not every comment answered. We can choose not to accept those "gifts" as Goenkaji calls them (reminded of this by a post on Kloncke). There is something powerful in standing up for oneself and fighting back. There is also something powerful about restraint, abstaining, taking the time and space to just be.  

What comes next after the fighting and then the restraint and abstaining? How about a try for the middle way? I have been listening and working on Gil Fronsdal's Concentration series at Audio Dharma. At one point he describes concentration meditation like fishing - too much slack and the fish gets away, too forceful and the line will break. Perhaps these discussions on race needs to be the same - enough creative tension to get people thinking outside of their normal assumptions but not some much as to make them defensive. Easier said than done but adding compassion, trying out equanimity and remembering we are all in this together could help. What if at the point where someone says something that brings on very strong feelings of aversion and rejection - we try and label these feelings and then watch them with non reactive awareness? What would happen if we could get angry at someone else's limited and seemingly bigoted perspective but then put that feeling in a "larger container" and watch its power fade?

What if we could listen to each other for what lies behind our words?

Could there be a simple and shared desire to be heard, acknowledged and appreciated?

Would this premise be worth testing? How about a Buddhist bloggers' roundtable or panel discussion on different topics related to race, diversity and Buddhism? But the goal would not be to show how someone is wrong or convert others to your viewpoint, it would be to practice what Katie calls "mindful blogging" and do it in the challenging context of a dialogue about race, diversity and Buddhism.  

Sooo... Anybody game? I guess this is somewhat presumptuous since it assumes people are actually reading my ramblings...Is anybody out there?

ps - just in case someone is out there, I want to again acknowledge influence and inspiration from Kloncke and Dangerous Harvests for this line of thought - thanks!